Mediatek Dimensity 7050 Vs Exynos 2200
The Mediatek Dimensity 7050 Vs Exynos 2200 Specification Comparison – These are two processors from Mediatek and Samsung known for their exceptional performance and efficiency. Both of these processors have been designed with advanced features and capabilities to provide users with top-notch performance and speed.
In this article, we will delve into a head-to-head comparison between two powerful processors. Join us as we explore the key features, performance capabilities, and technological advancements of the Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 7050, and examine how they stack up against each other in the fiercely competitive mobile processor landscape.”
You can also check its ranking on the Best Mobile Processor Ranking List. Additionally, you can use our Processor Comparison Tool to compare any processor to another.
Mediatek Dimensity 7050 Vs Exynos 2200 Specification Comparison
“Make sure to check out our full comparison table for Mediatek Dimensity 7050 Vs Exynos 2200 and feel free to share your feedback or suggestions with us.
Our goal at The Miraq is to provide our readers with the most informative and reliable tech resources possible.”
Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 7050 Which is the Best?
The Exynos 2200 is indeed a little better processor that boasts impressive performance, benchmark results, and a wide range of features. When comparing it to the processors, it stands out in several aspects.
| Product Name |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050Samsung Exynos 2200 |
| Product Image |
|
| Price | |
| Our Rating | |
| Brand | Mediatek Samsung |
| Category | Processor Processor |
Info
| Manufacturer | Mediatek Samsung |
| Announced | 02 May, 2023 18 January, 2022 |
| Model | Dimensity 7050 Exynos 2200 |
| Class | Mid range Flagship |
CPU
| Size | 6nm 4nm |
| Cores | 8 8 |
| CPU Configuration |
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x and 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| High Frequency | 2600 MHz 2800 MHz |
| Performance Core | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 |
| Power Efficient Core | 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4W 10 W |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS v3.1 |
GPU
| GPU | ARM Mali-G68 MC4 Xclipse 920 |
| GPU frequency | 800 MHz 1300 MHz |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall 2 AMD RDNA 2 |
| FLOPS | 686 Gigaflops |
| OpenCL Version | 2.0 2.0 |
| DirectX Support | 12 12 |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 1.1 |
| Shading units | 64 384 |
| Video Encoding |
HEVC, H.264, MPEG-1/2/4, VP-9
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Video Playback |
HEVC, H.264, MPEG-1/2/4, VP- 9 4K @ 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS |
| Gaming | MediaTek HyperEngine |
NPU
| APU / NPU / AI Proc. / Neural IP | MediaTek APU 3.0 Samsung FP16 Neural Engine |
Memory
| RAM Type | LPDDR5 LPDDR5 |
| RAM frequency | 3200 MHz 3200 MHz |
| RAM Max | 16 GB 24 GB |
| Max Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Bus Speed | 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit |
Connectivity
| Cellular Modem | Mediatek 5G Modem Samsung 5G Modem |
| Cellular Technology |
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G Multi-Mode, 4G Carrier Aggregation (CA), 5G Carrier Aggregation (CA), EDGE, 4G FDD / TDD, 5G FDD / TDD, GSM, TD-SCDMA, WDCDMA 5G NR Sub-6GHz 5.1Gbps (DL) / 2.55 Gbps (UL) 5G NR mmWave 7.35Gbps (DL) / 3.67 Gbps (UL) LTE Cat.24 8CA 3Gbps (DL) / Cat.22 4CA 422Mbps (UL) |
| 5G Modem | |
| 5G Network | SA & NSA modes; SA Option2, NSA Option3 / 3a / 3x, NR TDD Band, NR FDD Band, DSS, NR DL 2CC, 120 MHz bandwidth, 256QAM NR UL 2CC, 256QAM VoNR / EPS fallback 5G NR Sub-6GH, 5G NR Sub-6GHz |
| 5G mmWave | |
| 5G sub-6 GHz | |
| Download Speed | 4.7Gbps Up to 7.35Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 2.5Gbps Up to 3.67 Gbps |
| Dual SIM |
Wireless System
| wireless System | Mediatek Wireless System Samsung Wireless System |
| Wi-Fi Band | Wi-Fi 6 (a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| WiFi-5 | |
| WiFi-6 | |
| WiFi-6E | |
| Wi-Fi 7 | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth® 5.2 Bluetooth® 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS L1CA+L5 / BeiDou B1I+ B2a / Glonass L1OF / Galileo E1 + E5a / QZSS L1CA+ L5 / NavIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC |
| USB | USB-C, USB 3.1 USB-C, USB 3.1 |
| NFC |
ISP
| ISP | Mediatek ISP Samsung ISP |
| Single Camera | 200MP 200MP |
| Multi Camera | 64MP+ 32MP |
| Video capture |
4K at 30FPS 4K HDR, 4K @120, 8K @30 4K @240 and 8K @60 |
| Video Codec | H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
Display and Audio Support
| Display Support | 2520 x 1080 4K/WQUXGA @120Hz and QHD+ @144Hz |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz Up to 144Hz |
| Audio Playback | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Security
| Security Features |
Fingerprint and Face Unlock Samsung Knox |
| Fingerprint Sensor | |
| Face Detection |
Charging
| Charging Speed | Fast Charging |
Benchmarks
| AnTuTu benchmark scores | 502719 944281 |
| Geekbench scores |
Single-Core Score - 840 Multi-Core Score - 2314 Single-Core Score - 1145 Multi-Core Score - 3558 |
| 3DMark | 6532 |
New Arrivals
Recent Compares
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Vs Dimensity 9000
View Comparison →
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
View Comparison →
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 Vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
View Comparison →
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 Vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
View Comparison →
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 Vs Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
View Comparison →
-
Apple A17 Pro Vs A15 Bionic
View Comparison →
Xiaomi Poco F5 Gcam
