The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Vs Helio G96 Specification Comparison – These are two processors from Qualcomm and Mediatek known for their exceptional performance and efficiency. Both of these processors have been designed with advanced features and capabilities to provide users with top-notch performance and speed.
However, their architecture, manufacturing process, and other features differ, which can impact their performance and user experience.
In this article, we’ll compare the Mediatek Helio G96 Vs Snapdragon 680 processors, focusing on their features, performance, benchmark scores, and other important aspects.
Whether you’re a tech enthusiast, gamer, or business professional, knowing these differences can help you choose the best smartphone or device for your needs.
The CPU is a critical component in any mobile processor, and in this regard, both the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 and the MediaTek Helio G96 come with an octa-core configuration. However, there are some notable differences between these two processors.
Firstly, the Snapdragon 680 is manufactured using the 6nm process node, while the Helio G96 uses the older 12nm process. This means that the Snapdragon 680 can potentially offer better power efficiency and performance. Additionally, the Snapdragon 680 features a 4x 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x 1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver CPU configuration based on Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, respectively.
On the other hand, the Helio G96 is equipped with 2x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Snapdragon 680 also has a higher high-frequency clock speed of 2400 MHz compared to the Helio G96’s 2050 MHz. Finally, both processors support eMMC 5.1 and UFS 2.2 storage types.
The GPU is another crucial component of a mobile processor that affects the overall performance of the device. When comparing the Snapdragon 680 and the Helio G96, both come with similar GPU frequencies of 950 MHz. However, they use different GPU architectures.
The Snapdragon 680 features the Adreno 610 GPU, which is based on the Adreno 600 architecture, while the Helio G96 comes with the ARM Mali G57 MC2 GPU based on the Valhall architecture. The Mali G57 MC2 GPU is a more recent architecture and may offer better performance compared to the Adreno 610 GPU.
In terms of video encoding, both processors support H.264 and H.265/HEVC, but the Helio G96 also supports VP-9. Additionally, while both processors can handle video playback at up to 1080p at 60 frames per second, the Helio G96 offers a bit more flexibility as it also supports VP-9 video playback.
When it comes to memory, both the Snapdragon 680 and the Helio G96 support LPDDR4X RAM type with a similar frequency of 2133 MHz. However, the Helio G96 supports up to 10 GB of RAM, whereas the Snapdragon 680 supports a maximum of 8 GB.
In terms of maximum bandwidth, the Helio G96 offers a slightly higher bandwidth of 17.1 Gbit/s compared to the Snapdragon 680’s 17 Gbit/s. Both processors use a 2x 16-bit bus speed, which allows for faster data transfer between the processor and memory. Overall, the Helio G96 seems to have a slight advantage in terms of memory performance and capacity.
The modem is another critical component of a mobile processor that determines the device’s cellular connectivity and data transfer speeds. The Snapdragon 680 comes with the Qualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem, while the Helio G96 comes with a 4G modem manufactured by MediaTek. In terms of cellular technology, both processors support a range of technologies, including GSM/EDGE, WCDMA, TD-SCDMA, LTE FDD/TDD, and CDMA1x/EV-DO.
However, the Snapdragon 680 also supports LTE TDD support for CBRS. The Snapdragon 680 has a download speed of up to 390 Mbps and an upload speed of up to 150 Mbps, which is comparable to the Helio G96’s download and upload speeds. Both processors support 4G carrier aggregation (CA), HSPA+, and CDMA2000 1x/EVDO Rev. A (SRLTE), which helps to improve data transfer speeds and network reliability. Overall, the Snapdragon 680 and the Helio G96 seem to be on par in terms of modem and cellular connectivity features.
The image signal processor (ISP) is responsible for processing the images and videos captured by the device’s camera. The Snapdragon 680 comes with the Qualcomm Spectra 346 ISP, while the Helio G96 comes with a custom ISP developed by MediaTek.
The Snapdragon 680 supports a single-camera setup of up to 64 MP and a triple-camera setup of 13+13+5 MP, while the Helio G96 supports a dual-camera setup of 16+16 MP and a single-camera setup of up to 108 MP. Both processors can capture 1080p video at 60 FPS, but the Helio G96 can also capture 2K video at 30 FPS and 1K video at 60 FPS.
In terms of video codec, both processors support H.265 (HEVC), which is a more efficient codec for compressing video files than the older H.264 codec. Overall, the Helio G96 seems to have a slight edge in camera and video capture capabilities, particularly in supporting higher-resolution cameras and video recording at higher frame rates and resolutions.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Geekbench Score, (a benchmark that measures CPU performance) for the Single-Core is 373 and the Multi-Core score is 1548, and Helio G96 Geekbench Score for the Single-Core is 544 and the Multi-Core score is 1884.
|Snapdragon 680||Helio G96|
|Newly Launched||Better Geekbench Score|
|Has a smaller size (6 versus 12 nm)||Better Antutu Score|
|higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2050 MHz)||Supports higher memory bandwidth (17.01 Gbit/s against 17 GB/s)|
These features make the Snapdragon 680 the best choice for users looking for top-of-the-line performance and advanced device capabilities.
“Make sure to check out our full comparison table for Mediatek Helio G96 Vs Sd 680 and feel free to share your feedback or suggestions with us.
Our goal at The Miraq is to provide our readers with the most informative and reliable tech resources possible.”
|Announced||27 October, 2021 16 June, 2021|
|Class||Low end Low range|
4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 and 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
|High Frequency||2400 MHz 2050 MHz|
|Performance Core||4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76|
|Power Efficient Core||4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55|
|Core architecture||hybrid (big.LITTLE) hybrid (big.LITTLE)|
|Instruction set||ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A|
|Storage Type||eMMC, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2|
|GPU||Adreno 610 ARM Mali G57 MC2|
|GPU frequency||950 MHz 950 MHz|
|GPU Architecture||Adreno 600 Valhall|
|OpenCL Version||2.0 2.0|
|DirectX Support||12 12|
|Vulkan version||1.1 1.1|
|Shading units||128 32|
H.264 (Advanced Video Coding (AVC)), VP9, VP8, H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC))
H.264, H.265 / HEVC
Up to 1080p @ 60 fps
H.264 (Advanced Video Coding (AVC)), VP9, VP8, H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)) H.264, H.265 / HEVC, VP-9
|Gaming||MediaTek HyperEngine 2.0|
|APU / NPU / AI Proc. / Neural IP||Qualcomm® Hexagon™ 686 Yes|
|RAM Type||LPDDR4X LPDDR4x|
|RAM frequency||2133 MHz 2133 MHz|
|RAM Max||8 GB 10 GB|
|Max Bandwidth||17 Gbit/s 17.1 Gbit/s|
|Bus Speed||2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit|
|Cellular Modem||Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ X11 LTE modem Mediatek 4G modem|
TD-SCDMA, LTE TDD support for CBRS, LTE TDD, CDMA 1x, EV-DO, GSM/EDGE, LTE FDD, WCDMA (DC-HSDPA), WCDMA (DC-HSUPA)
4G Carrier Aggregation (CA), CDMA2000 1x/EVDO Rev. A (SRLTE), 4G FDD / TDD, HSPA +
|5G sub-6 GHz|
|Download Speed||Up to 390 Mbps|
|Upload Speed||Up to 150 Mbps|
|wireless System||Qualcomm® FastConnect™ 6100 Mediatek Wireless System|
|Wi-Fi Band||802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11ac Wi-Fi 5 (a/b/g/n/ac)|
|Bluetooth||Bluetooth® 5.1 Bluetooth® 5.2|
|GPS||GLONASS, NavIC, Beidou, GPS, QZSS, Galileo GPS / QZSS L1+ L5 / Galileo E1 + E5a / BeiDou B1C + B2a / NAVIC|
|ISP||Qualcomm® Spectra™ 346 Mediatek Custom ISP|
|Single Camera||Up to 64 MP 108MP|
13+13+5 MP triple camera
16+16 MP dual camera 16MP + 16MP
1080p @ 60 FPS
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
|Video Codec||H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)) H.264, H.265 / HEVC|
3X ISP; AI Face Detection; HW depth engine; AINR; Single-Cam/Dual-Cam Bokeh; Hardware Warping Engine (EIS); Rolling Shutter Compensation (RSC) engine; MEMA 3DNR; Multi-Frame Noise reduction;
|Display Support||• FHD+ (1080 x 2520 @ 90 Hz) • HD+ (900 x 1600 @ 90 Hz) 2520 x 1080|
|Refresh Rate||90Hz 120Hz|
|Audio Playback||AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV|
|Bluetooth Audio||Qualcomm Aqstic™ audio codec up to Qualcomm® WCD9385|
Secure Boot, HW Crypto Cores, Qualcomm® Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), Trusted UI Framework, Widevine™ L1 V15 DRM, Debug Security, Qualcomm® Content Protection Framework, HW/SW storage security, HW/SW Key Management
FingerPrint and Face Unlock
|Charging Speed||Qualcomm® Quick Charge™ 3.0 technology|
|AnTuTu benchmark scores||269430 329266|
Single-Core Score - 373
Multi-Core Score - 1548 Single-Core Score - 544
Multi-Core Score - 1884